(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-13 01:45 pm (UTC)
emperor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] emperor
I wonder how it would have fared if they'd managed a watertight box...

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-13 01:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com
Not bad.
I'd imagine the garaged car would have looked a lot more like the one in the concrete box had it been kept in a UK garage.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-13 01:57 pm (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
I suspect it would have been too big to fit in a 1950s UK garage. But I've not found garages here to be particularly damp and leaky.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-13 01:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brrm.livejournal.com
If they're leaky, it's good if they're also draughty. :-)

My garage currently leaks, and this seems not to have had an adverse effect on the contents yet, although I'm trying to arrange to have it fixed.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-13 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com
*laughs*, true on the first point.
They don't have to be leaky. The UK climate is a lot more variable across the year than the one in California and while it will not rain inside the garage, there would still be more humidity when it's raining.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-13 03:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arron-shutt.livejournal.com
Make you wonder whether nuclear waste might be better stored in a garage than in a concrete box underground.. :)

Profile

brrm: (Default)
brrm

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags